FC Barcelona are currently top of the standings in LaLiga and are busy preparing to face Manchester United in the Europa League on Thursday. But a report, which was first released on Cadena SER radio program Que t'hi jugues, alleges that Barcelona paid Jose Maria Enriquez Negreira, through his company DASNIL 95, €1.4m (£1.2m) during Josep Bartomeu's presidency.
All those payments are alleged by the prosecutor's office to have been made by Barcelona to DASNIL 95, with a report by Spain's Tax Agency, which is investigating Negreira's company, and seen by Diario AS, claiming they wanted 'to make sure that no refereeing decisions were made against, that is, "that everything was neutral". Having already testified, Negreira and his son Javier Enríquez Romero have reportedly denied that Barcelona ever received any preferential treatment from referees. In his testimony, according to Cadena SER, Negreira claimed that his alleged agreement with Barcelona was to see him recommend how their players should behave in game with referees. It is claimed that he tailored his advice depending on the referee they were assigned for upcoming matches. That is, what they could and should not do depending on the referee designated for the matches. The Tax Agency has attested that there is no documentation currently in their possession which details any such relationship of consultancy between Negreira and Barcelona.
The timing is disastrous for Barcelona having spent recent years mired in controversy - but they came out fighting in their own statement on Wednesday. Faced with the information broadcast today on the program Quê t'hi jugues de Ser Catalunya, FC Barcelona, aware of the facts being investigated by the Prosecutor's Office regarding payments made to external companies, wants to make it clear that “Barcelona hired in the past the services of an external technical consultant, who supplied, in video format, technical reports referring to players in lower categories of the Spanish State for the Club's technical secretariat. Additionally, the relationship with the same external supplier was extended with technical reports related to professional refereeing in order to complement information required by the coaching staff of the first team and the subsidiary, a common practice in professional football clubs. Currently, this type of outsourced service falls to a professional attached to the Football Department. Barcelona regrets that this information appears precisely at the best sporting moment of the season. Barcelona will take legal action against anyone who damages the image of the Club with possible insinuations contrary to the reputation of the entity that may arise as a result of this information.” If found to have acted illicitly Barcelona, who are currently at loggerheads with LaLiga president Javier Tebas over their continued support for a European Super League, could face stringent penalties. Both Barcelona and Negreira deny wrongdoing. The investigation continues. (Source: Daily Mail)
Spanish statistician Pedro Martin has highlighted the fact that during that period, Barcelona benefitted from 30 more penalties than their opponents and 19 more red cards for the opposition. In the past five years, they had 12 more penalties than their opponents (and 16 more penalties given against them), while they only had 4 less red cards than opponents over the past five years, receiving 16 more. During those three seasons involving payments to Negreira, Barcelona won two leagues and lost the other to Real Madrid. Some claim that the payments went all the way back to 2003 and even before that time. Diario AS put together a table of similar figures over that time between 2003 and 2018, when the payments stopped. Over the course of 15 years, Barcelona have a balance of 68 penalties in their favour, while in terms of sendings off, that balance sits at 43 in their favour. Both of those balances are the highest for any side and in particular, Barcelona have a significant margin over their rivals in terms of red cards. (Source: Football
Espana)
